Globalization and Small Scale Industry Sector in India Introduction: Table -1
The SSI sector total contribution to the countries export has been estimated at 45.50% where direct exports are estimated to constitute about 30%in the year 2001. The main items of export are gems and jewellery sports, goods, ready made garment, woolen garment and nightwear, plastic products, processed food. Table 1 shows the trends in increasing number of units and increasing in quality of exports. Years given in the table shows the position of SSI from 1993-2001.From 1995-1996 the number shows the trends after the second generation reform period. Though the number of unit and production were increasing but employment was not increasing at the faster rate.
The various credit policies which were especially meant for SSI sector : priority lading, 40% of advances to SSI sector reserved for tiny sector and village and cottage industries, reference facilities and special scheme of SIDBI, confessional rate of interest for loans up to Rs.2 laths ,single window scheme of SIDBI for project out lays up to Rs.50 lac Under prime minister Rojgar yojana, loans in respect to of 133 micro enterprises were sanctioned in 1993-94,196 133 enterprises in 1994-95 and 1-1, 321 enterprises in April -November 1995. Some of the other incentives include reservation of products for exclusive manufacture purchase and price preference, infrastructural support to entrepreneurship development institutes to augment their training their trading capacities, joint programmed with the state bank of India and small industries development Bank of India for modernization and technology up gradation of industries cluster, assistance to setup testing center, and special programmers on vendor development quality awareness etc. Critical Analysis of NEP Towards SSI Sector :: In This part of the paper certain flows in the NEP are discussed along certain suggestion from the experience of the economics like Japan and South corea which are industrially dominated by small scale unites. Although only a small footnote in the industrial policy statement of 1991 mentioned that the reservation of small sector would continue, no other measure was suggested to revamp the small sector. Regarding the supply of credit to the small sector the rate of interest concretization on confessional credit was barely o.5 percent to one percent, no concretization of the volume of credit has been made. The government should have specified the proportion of intuitional credit that would be made available to the small sector on a priority basis. The policy statement makes an important recommendation regarding the provision of equity to be held by another undertaking up to 24 percent in a small unit. this other undertaking may be small or large, Indian or foreign .The government would describe this development as integration of the small sector with the large sector There, is however ,a strong fear that such a provision may at alater stage facilities the take over of small sector by the large sector. The implication of this danger in terms of employment displacement is very grave. Regarding transfer of technology by the large units to the small units, it is doubtful whether the large units will ever like this to take place, but big units are interested to use to small units only as sub-contracting agencies for small jobs, they would never encourage them to become impended units reveal that the big firms do not make timely payments to the small units even after the delivery of good by the latter to the former. Government policy does not even take the note of the number of sick units in the small sector. An analysis of India policy towards small scale industry heights the facts that supply side intervention subsidized loans, tax exemptions, industrial estates and product reservation in favor of small scale enterprises, are ineffective in achieving the desired objective of employment oriented industrial development micro interventions were ineffective because they were carried out in a distorted macro economic environment.tariffs,exchang rates, investment incentives credit and public sector policies, instead of practicing interventions designed to alter the enterprise size, structure within industries, policies favorable to change in the composition of industrial output in line with the comparative advantage need to be implemented. It is interesting to note the experience of South Korea. In order to promote efficient sub contracting the Korea government enacted in 1975 the small Industry subcontracting promotion Act. Under this linkage system product judged appropriate for small and medium enterprises are reserved for them only. The linkage system provides for organization of supplier firms around each principal manufacturer and they share the technology knowledge. Further the Korea Credit Guarantee fund(KCGF) generates the linked guarantee scheme. Under this the principal manufacture and the supplier work together to manage the credit of the suppliers and KCGD guarantees the obligations of suppliers which enables them to get credit on favorable terms. The principal manufacture and the suppliers work together to manage the credit of the suppliers .programmed of their kind are probably unique to Korea. So it can be concluded from the above analysis that the policy for SSI can be passive, protective and development. for a dynamic economy, development approach is the most describe one. The aim of the development approach is not to preserve traditional primitive and outmoded units against change but to transform and the sector as awhole to gain competitiveness. In this regard a mention can be made to the promotional agencies because they from an essential and integral part of development policy for SSI. The promotional agencies encourage the growth of small scale enterprise but protective measures encourage SSI units to remain small rather than transform itself to larger size over period of time Response of the small Scale Sector :: The small scale sector being unorganized, there has been a marked absence of strategic moves in response to the changing economic environment. Especially with the lifting of qES on imports, reservation of items for the SSI sector if going to become meaningless. Removal of qEs is not going to lead to flood of imports( Vasudeva,2000) and it is not going to be cakewalk to enter the Indian market, especially the rural market, for the foreign brands. However it is expected that there will be dislocations in some of the highly protected sector and where the production cost are higher than the global level. Conclusion :: In the light of the above discussion, the government policy should be to help SSI units to upgrade technology, improve productivity and remain competitive in the market. Promotional agencies shoud be given a new thrust in this direction. Bibliography ::
*************************************************** Dr. Suresh.P. Raval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 KCG. All Rights Reserved. | Powered By : Prof. Hasmukh Patel
Home | Archive | Advisory Committee | Contact us |